we're viewers like you.

showrunnersblog
you're reading...

Monday Media Lowlights

by Mark Boyer | March 10, 2008

After news broke that New York Governor Eliot Spitzer has been identified as “Client Number 9″ in a federal wiretap linking him to a prostitution ring, Spitzer gave the shortest press conference in history (see video below). The whole thing clocked in at about a minute, leaving the cable news talking heads with a whole afternoon of airtime to fill. So they did what they do best: they misreported the facts, speculated on topics that they don’t know much about, and spouted a bunch of unsubstantiated opinions.

tucker.jpgThe party started with FOX News incorrectly (or prematurely) reporting that Spitzer would be indicted and that he was going to resign, according to The New York Times‘ City Room blog. Then, on CNBC, Jim Cramer, who it turns out is a friend of Spitzer, was absolutely shell-shocked. “I hope it’s not true,” Cramer said; “I just hope it’s not true. If it’s true, it’s obviously very sad. It’s bad.” (If you’re unfamiliar with Cramer’s abilities as a performer, watch this clip.)

Over on MSNBC, Alan Dershowitz defended Spitzer, suggesting that it was America’s fault for being a “pandering society and hypocritical society.” And one of the best cable news moments of the day goes to Tucker Carlson, who was on the same broadcast. Carlson continued with Dershowitz’s tack, suggesting not that this story is a product of our society, but that it’s an outgrowth of the filthy, scandal-obsessed, sex-crazed media: “You see the press, a group that has, frankly, pretty unconventional personal lives, by and large, getting all high-handed that a grown man went to a prostitute is nauseating,” Carlson said. “I just think this is one of the least sleazy things he’s done.” (HuffPo has the whole clip.)

Monday, of course, was a big day for Carlson, as it was announced this morning that his show would be taken off the air and that David Gregory would be taking his place. Perhaps he was just passive aggressively blowing off some steam when they asked him about Spitzer. Ah, well, that’s probably better for his psyche than hitting the dance floor.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Reader Comments

Mark, you had to mention Alan Dershowitz, didn’t you! I just hope the feds are tapping his line. He looks like a guy with a lot of kinky secrets. Why else would he be so defensive of the Spitz?

Yeah, that was just for you. If I were you, I’d change my name and start burning my fingerprints off now.

I think that the best part about the lopsided Interest to Info ratio that the 24 networks had to deal with was the endless repetition of “client #9″.

Its got some sort of tawdry “007″ style to it, or something. In anycase, client #9 has ABSOLUTELY entered our collective lexicon and isn’t likely to leave anytime soon.

HOw long before someone uses “client #9″ NOT to refer to Spitzer, I wonder?

Agreed! Client #9 is totally going to be the title of a made-for-TV movie about this. Or people will say something like, “Hey man, be careful, don’t go Client #9 on me…” I could so get used to that.

But what I want to know is: What about Clients #1 through #8? They’re totally getting shafted in terms of their time in the limelight.

Yeah, that does have a nice ring to it. But mostly I’m just curious about what $4,300 buys you these days. And who is this “Kristen”?

I just wish that the figure had been $4,600 - the amount you can legally contribute a presidential candidate’s campaign (2,300 for primary and general each)

That would have been sweet. Ah, what if, what if….

wow, the Post has all the “steamy details.”

Interesting post about people buying up domain names relevant to the case, e.g. client9.com.

Said the 37-year-old software engineer who registered client9.com: “The original story didn’t name [Governor Eliot] Spitzer directly, but I thought [Client9.com] sounded catchy, so I bought it.”

Link: http://mashable.com/2008/03/11/eliot-spitzer/

In other news, some folks have started selling “Client #9″ T-shirts.

http://digg.com/world_news/Client_9_T_shirts_hit_the_Web_3

Really? Do we really need another slogan / catch-phrase T-shirt? As if this wasn’t enough…

Nice! Yeah, we do need more of those so I can finally retire my “Pedro for President” shirt. And check this out: Client #10 is from Chicago…Please please please let it be Blago.

It may or may not be Blago: 1) He does screw (over) everything that moves; but 2) The man’s always asking for money, which — just my opinion — doesn’t sound like a “Client 10 ” to me. I’d expect someone slightly more capable..

Leave a Reply