we're viewers like you.

showrunnersblog
you're reading...

Charlie Rose Re-Mixed

by Dorothee | March 20, 2008

While exploring videoart.net, I came across this short film, ‘Charlie Rose’ by Samuel Beckett by experimental filmmaker Andrew Filippone Jr. The re-mix of the popular PBS series “Charlie Rose” shows the host engaging in an absurd conversation with himself about the state of technology today. His repetition of the words “google”, “Microsoft” and “yahoo” place these entities in a farcical context while at the same time implying their disturbingly large importance in our lives. Say “google” three times and it begins to sound like gibberish. Say it yet a few more times and you recognize the power contained in that word. The filmmaker explains,

“Something has happened to PBS favorite “Charlie Rose.” The erudite conversations and sober intellectualism have been replaced by an absurd world where illogic, inane dialogues, and open hostility rule. The one-on-one interview between Charlie and his guest begins as usual but quickly goes awry, so much so that Charlie is warned that, somewhere, a man named “Steve” is “not happy.” Though this seemingly random statement might confuse us, Charlie understands it for what it is — a threat. But who is “Steve” and why is he angry? And why does the mere mention of his name stop Charlie cold?”

Add to Technorati Favorites

Reader Comments

Sweet video! Must have taken awhile to do. It reminds me of the video I did for Stephen Colbert’s viewer challenge last year, “For Your Editing Pleasure.” It’s a remix of footage he asked viewers to edit to make him look crazy.

Wow, look how beat up Charlie was on the show this week:

charlierose.jpg

HuffPost says he tripped and decided to do go face first, instead of damaging his brand-new macbook air.

I’m going to explicitly answer your rhetorical question about “Steve.”

No wait, I won’t state the obvious.

I think this is brilliant. Charlie is such a sweetie. He’d love this. I think the filmmaker isn’t very good at describing his own work: “illogic, inane dialogues, and open hostility rule.”

OK on 1 and 2 there, but number three? A mashup of Chris Matthews or Bill O’Reilly would apply far better to the label, “open hostility.” I would call this, gently absurdist. I do think it is brilliant.

Leave a Reply